26th Nov2009

Happy Thanksgiving, 402 Productions!

by nickwan
Black Out Friday, last year

Black Out Friday, last year

Hope you’re eating some nice tofurkey and lentil stuffing. Or turkey and mashed potatoes. Speaking of food, if you’re ever bored and want to read some comical reviews of food I would suggest checking out Gigi’s Reviews. If I ever got to meet her, I’d take her out on a date.

It’s a meek day here in northern California… but tonight is the second annual Black Out Friday. We’ll be missing some key members this time around… no Erik Schau and possibly no Brandon Lowder… but I will hopefully be mostly rested to take on the task of a 24-hour designated driver. Any suggestions of places we should go and try to incite chaos?

21st Nov2009

UNDER THE RADAR – volcano!

by tambo

3

It really feels like I’m witnessing a total solar eclipse when I find myself listening to a song over and over again for days on end.  It’s a different feeling from when I’m editing film to music, or, for example, when Lil’ Wayne’s “A Milli” first came out, where I listen and listen and listen and then suddenly, poof, the magic is gone and I never want to hear the song again.  I can’t think of anything more rare than a total solar eclipse to analogize with what I am currently experiencing.

I can’t exactly recall how I stumbled upon volcano! and their newest release, “So Many Lemons”, and I would rather not say anything more until it is heard:
volcano! – “So Many Lemons”
“So Many Lemons” music video

volcano!, or the collective minds of Chicagoans Aaron With (vocals/guitas), Mark Cartwright (electronics), and Sam Scranton (drums/percussion), has a relatively decent history in the noise rock genre having released their first album, Beautiful Seizures, back in 2005 on The Leaf Label as well as opening for Deerhoof, The National, and current indie-blog favorites, The Dirty Projectors along the way.  Seizures is a little TOO sporadic and noise-rocky for my tastes, but there are definitely some gems (“La Lluvia” into “Red And White Bells”, for two).  Seizures apparently garnered enough acclaim to interest Vincent Moon over at La Blogotheque to record two Take-Away Show tracks.  The first video sounds more like the drunken assholes who used to co-captain the off-shoot a cappella/improv combo-choir at the local junior college, not the fittingly epileptic operatics found on Seizures, but their sound really clears up and takes shape into something much more than noise in their sophomore album, Paperwork, released in 2008.

Paperwork, even to this day (about two months after the first of many, many back-to-back-to-back listens), continues to surprise me.  Every song has its’ noise-rocky tics, its’ classic rock hooks and great segues in between.  Take “Performance Evaluation Shuffle”, the first track off of Paperwork: the song starts off in this poppy, jump-aroundy, head-noddy kind-of swing with With’s vocals bouncing around atop his guitar strums and Scranton’s almost marching-band beat.  The song breaks off perfectly and begins to build, xylophone/marimba/similar instrument and all.  With suddenly shifts to fluent spanish vocals as he croons to the apex of the build-up, followed by the breakdown which slams us through to the end of the track.  It’s an insane three-and-a-half minutes of pop, hardcore, punk, jazz, rock, insert genre here, and so on, but it’s not crazy for crazy’s sake like most of the noise-rock/indie/Animal Collective’s out there today.  It’s calculated chaos and it works.  It’s like an anarchist commune – it doesn’t make sense, but it does.  Check it out:
volcano! – “Performance Evaluation Shuffle”

“PES” is just a taste.  Every track on Paperwork has something to offer.  My personal favorites are “Tension Loop”, a beautiful jazz-electro ballad that fades into a Johnny Greenwood-esque guitar outro (accompanied by a bicycle bell, of course) and “Astronomer’s Ballad”, one of those classic spanish-spaghetti-space-western-psychosis-love songs. Need I say more?

I never thought mixing Battles, Talking Heads, Deerhoof, and whatever the drug of choice is out in the midwest would produce anything worth a darn let alone listenable, but I can’t wait for whatever is to come next of volcano!!  Check them out TODAY. RIGHT NOW. GO.

20th Nov2009

Brand New – Daisy

by Adam Haynes

brand_new-daisy

Brand New is perhaps best known for being everyone’s favorite band to either love or love to have. The Long Island group’s fourth studio album, Daisy, manages to bring the divisiveness to a whole new level.

The contrast between “soft and slow” and “loud and fast” that Brand New has made a staple of their songwriting style takes on a whole new life in Daisy. Individual tracks play out as those portions dynamic components for the album instead of each track possessing those traits internally.  The “fast and heavy” tracks, most notably the album’s opener, “Vices”, are relentless in their determination to show off just how much noise the boys of Brand New can make.  The slower tracks, such as “Bed”, present a conscious break from the pop punk choruses of the past.

The album feels much weaker lyrically than past albums, especially when compared to their 2006 album, “The Devil and God are Raging Inside Me”.  The rhyme schemes often come off as simplistic and uninspired.  Despite is lyrically weakness their are a few poetic bright spots on the album (e.g. “Gasoline”, “You Stole”, and the albums title track, “Daisy”).


19th Nov2009

NW Reviews: Rachael Cantu – Far and Wide

by nickwan

After a day or so, the lovely Rachael Cantu ended up sending me a copy of her album for reviewing! What a sweetheart. So thanks to her for that.

On to business: how does someone like Rachael not get picked up by some label yet? Her touring history consists of some legends (BB King just this past October) as well as some more big name indie acts (e.g. Tegan & Sara). Her music is right in the mix of the evolving singer-songwriter scene. It seems that her persistence is paying off as she makes new strides with her newest album Far and Wide.

This new album unleashes a sweet blend between that broken down acoustic-y bedroom sound and that full band acoustic rock vibe. Maybe some comparisons would be drawn as the female version of someone like Kevin Devine or Bon Iver. Rachael’s album is on par with Kevin Devine’s release of Put Your Ghost to Rest blending together many similar elements. The element that varies the most is the amount of more indie-pop in Rachael’s latest album and the amount of more folky-punk on Kevin’s PYGTR… but this isn’t a comparison of what is what. This is a review!

The album starts off with the familiar tune “Devil’s Thunder”, previously heard on Rachael’s EP release earlier this year. The song itself was used on ABC’s show Private Practice, but sadly didn’t turn up field into a radio smash. The tune itself sets the stage for something along the lines of a darker album, something maybe more menacing or wreckoning. However, by track two, the album itself changes directions back to the more feel-good hits of the winter. The entire album is very consistent, never entering a perilous two-faced nature that some of these singer-songwriters tend to attract. Some strong tracks off the album are “Thieves and their Hands”, “Blue House Baby”, and “Make a Name for Me and You”.

Rachael Cantu – Theives and their Hands

Rachael Cantu – Devil’s Thunder

pros

This album is the female answer to a scene filled with so many male artists. It seems that the only way girls can make it in this scene are if they are supported by a band some how. You have all heard about Paramore, Metric, and Rilo Kiley, but what about artists like Joanna Newsom and Rachael Cantu? Where is their piece of the scene pie? Also, This album is very clean and crisp in production quality, unlike Real Estate’s car crash of a post-production mix. Also, Rachael doesn’t shy away from her strengths. The strong stance of guitar and vocals in each song defines what Rachael Cantu is all about.

cons

After “Devil’s Thunder” I was amped to hear the rest of the album in the same vein as this kind of slow, dark theme. Rather, the album flips to some more pop type song structures and leaves the sort of post-rock (post-acoustic I guess?) set up that “Devil’s Thunder” ran with. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, since the album itself does stay true to the acoustic-indie-pop identity, but I felt set up for something along the lines of For Emma, Forever Ago.

But. Where does this rank between albums like David Bazan’s, Owen’s, and Kevin Devine’s? Lyrically, probably more punch than Kevin’s Brother’s Blood. With that, it’s worthy enough to be considered… but topping Bazan? We’ll see.

goodalbumalbumoftheyearnominee

17th Nov2009

NW Reviews: Real Estate – S/T

by nickwan

I’d like to say to the new readers: thanks so much for subscribing/reading this blog regularly! Also, it’s definitely really cool to see some people posting comments that aren’t spam, in Russian, or Russian spammers. Before I get into this fairly new “it” band, I’d just like to announce that I never received a promo album from Rachael Cantu! Her new album, Far and Wide, is out and I would like to propose to her review it. Also, that is one of the many albums I SHOULD be reviewing right now, but this band seems to be lighting up the indie blogosphere at the moment… so I guess I’ll join the fray.

Real Estate, not to be confused with Sunny Day Real Estate, nor should it be confused with the not-so-indie-famous/electronica South African group The Real Estate Agents. Real Estate is one of those… interestingly weird bands. You know when The Books or Do Make Say Think or Sigur Ros or From Monument to Masses came out and it was kind of a “where do we put you?” type reaction from the scene? Well, from those mixtures and fixtures of bands came this new scene of art rock (a la The Books or Jonsi & Alex) where it was a mix of progressive rock or post-rock and a splash of something else, may it be orchestral (Sigur Ros), sample/electronica (From Monument to Masses), or along the lines of singer/songwriter sounding indie (I guess The Books? Feel free to debate me out on this). Real Estate is taking a slightly progressive stance with that leading feel of jam rock/surf-y rock-pop and mashing it together with a thick, pasty sound of slow core. Is it good? Well…

There is definitely a place for this band. Brooklyn seemingly has liked it enough to go to their shows enough to boost them to indie-stardom. Now, will they break through to the surface and smash a hit? Hard to say. The band is so young, with this self titled release being their first full length album. The band seems to have that pop quality potential to sell a single, much like how The Strokes busted out of NYC with Is This It? and have now topped the charts almost regularly. It was hard to predict the success of The Strokes when they were just starting out since no one knew that throw back 70s rock was going to be the next “thing”. Is indie-surf-prog-pop the next “thing”? If you asked me today, I’d say hell no. But I’ve been wrong before, and will be wrong in the future. Why couldn’t indie-surf-prog-rock be the next thing? What is stopping Real Estate from besting acts like The White Stripes, The Strokes, Green Day, The Offspring, Death Cab for Cutie, Vampire Weekend, OneRepublic, Fall Out Boy, Silversun Pickups, Weezer, The Fray, Paramore, AFI, or The Yeah Yeah Yeahs (to name a few)? Even on a lesser scale, what is stopping Real Estate to best the indie bands of today like Bon Iver, The Get Up Kids, Jawbox, Owen, An Horse, Tegan & Sara, David Bazan, Beirut, M. Ward, Morrissey, Say Anything, New Found Glory, Kings of Leon, or SUNNY DAY Real Estate (just to name another few)? Well… well… um… well. I don’t know exactly. But all those bands either followed through a niche or created their own somehow, major examples being The Strokes and The White Stripes. What’s to say indie-surf-prog-rock won’t sliver in and poison the counter (yes, an MTG reference…)?

pros

The album itself is definitely what Felisha Gonzalez would call “sleepy time” music. I could honestly listen to this forever… if I were asleep forever. I’m not saying I’d rather die than listen to this album for the rest of my life, but I’m just saying I don’t know if I could do it in the day. I could also see this as a nice album to just zone out to or study to. The instrumentation is great: great guitar work, great back tracks to most of these songs to aid the not-so-fancy drum works, and solid, lovely bass playing to fill out that prog-ish feel while still kind of poppy and surfy.

cons

The album has some post-production qualities that don’t necessarily “twang” with my personal taste. Not to be funny or anything, that twangy sound coming from the twangy surf guitars aren’t the problem… it was the horrible mixing job. Either bad choice in microphones or bad choice in limiter pre-amps. It could also be a bad choice in gate/comp. pre amps. The lo-fi sound only goes so far before it becomes blatantly obvious and annoying. Also, without distinct differentiation between more “hit” type songs and more “fan favorites” I could see this album becoming more of a “loved”/”hated” album rather than a “liked by everyone”/”could listen to it if it were on” type album. Kind of like the difference between The Offspring’s albums (usually loved by the masses or hated) and Death Cab for Cutie’s latest albums (relatively liked by everyone or wouldn’t really bother those who don’t really like listening to just Death Cab).

People who would like this: Aside from hipsters and audiophiles looking for the next “it” band, I would go out on a limb and say fans of Death Cab for Cutie and Pedro the Lion and other slow core bands. This kind of links the slow core sadness with the happy, dancy vibe of the current scene. It wraps up musicianship together with that slow driving song writing style of slow core and slams it with this weird tone that I can only describe as “smiley face sounding”.

The verdict: I really am at a loss for words. Not too many albums take the thoughts out of my mind, especially when I’ve been thinking about this album for the past day. Regardless, I think it bears enough merit to jump up on that lucky list for it’s creativity for sure. We’ll see if it has enough punch to make the list, which is coming together soon… but for now…

goodalbumalbumoftheyearnominee

12th Nov2009

NW Reviews: Say Anything – S/T

by nickwan

Something that is refreshing: Bemis went back to the acoustics. When you get famous from being promoted by Chris Carrabba and riding on the coat tails of Saves the Day… maybe that fan base is something you don’t want to turn your back on. Did Bemis turn his back on his fan base when he released In Defense of a Genre? No, but it was definitely a step in that direction. Luckily, this new album takes that step back towards reality for Max, Coby, and crew.

Dropping the armored facade of the scene saviors, Max decided to go back to strong lyrics with promising instruments backing his slightly grimy vocal tone. Songs like “Less Cute” take that direction that I felt when I heard “Woe” for the first time. In fact, a lot of this album is reminiscent of a lot of those songs he did back around that Menora/Majora EP age. Stronger on the acoustics, but still bringing that indie rock back. Max said that they were going for less of a “scene” sound and back to the “…Is a Real Boy” sound. I believe that they achieved this.

The pros: well written songs. The album is all over the place as far as ideas and sounds but each song stays in the box Bemis has made and expands to fit that mold very nicely. There isn’t very much horrible about this album.

The cons: the only real horrible thing on this album is that… even though they are trying to take that step back into their own sound, that isn’t taking major strides forward. Bemis has stated this, and he says this is only the first step in a new Say Anything world, but it still isn’t progressing them any further into a newly evolved Say Anything. This album was definitely a stride in the right direction, just not the long jump they might have made out to seem.

goodalbum

11th Nov2009

NW Reviews: Them Crooked Vultures – S/T

by nickwan

Them Crooked Vultures are one of those way too exciting bands. Angels and Airwaves was the last “supergroup” of mostly mainstream stars to form a band. Every so often you got that random Long Island duo-tour from Jesse Lacey and Kevin Devine or Lacey and John Nolan, and that sold out every show as well. But nothing sells a show out like “Led Zeppelin”. And when you have John Paul Jones, Dave Grohl on the drums and vocals, and Josh Homme on vocals and the guitar, I do believe that you have yourself that way-too-exciting supergroup that has yet to release an album. Until today.

TCV released a full stream of their album today. After many listens, I’ve concluded a few things about this self titled adventure. First off, their live shows (via YouTube) might be confusing to understand what the hell is going on since there is so much pushing around during these tapings, but for the most part… the album sounds better than what we’ve heard through live bootlegs. Second, I feel slightly bad for John Paul Jones. I don’t know where JPJ’s input falls into during the songwriting process, but sadly they could have gone with any bassist.

Something that definitely is nice: this isn’t Queens of the Stone Age 2.0. It’s a lot more throwback rock and roll. Songs like “New Fang” and the first track, “No One Loves Me & Neither Do I” are realms of Homme (front man of the legendary QOTSA) that I have never heard before. This might be the doings of JPJ’s Zep influence possibly. Dave Grohl definitely has his drumming role fit to a T as his meshes with this kind of music almost flawlessly. Everyone has their showcasing on this album, and it isn’t cocky like you would think. Well, maybe on “New Fang” it might be. But there are no drawn out solos or rhythmic patterns or oversized bass or drums on any of the songs. Good writing, for the most part.

The pros: good music! Vocals really compliment each other, Homme with Grohl. JPJ hasn’t lost touch and is just as fast as he was in his “Black Dog” days. He even has some weird organ “No Quarter” sounding stuff on this album.

The cons: it isn’t that music-changing album Homme and Grohl attested to. Yes, it is something different… but it isn’t something we haven’t heard. We definitely haven’t heard anything like this from them, but the taste of QOTSA is still there — despite the strong effort from JPJ’s strong presence at times.

The verdict: it’s definitely a good album. It’s really fun actually. Songs like “Elephants” are so great and make you wonder where this kind of music went? Well, Sonoma County readers, this kind of music is all over the place… and “the place” is called The Fox 101.7. This is just dug up and revitalized chump rock from the late 70s. In some chasm somewhere, I’m sure you can find this album pieced together from B-sides of Zeppelin, Motorhead, and Jimi Hendrix. But could these guys drive that tough-guy no-frills rock and roll back into the veins of the rock scene? Not with this album. But it’s definitely a great album, and possibly better than An Horse’s attempt. Seeing how they were once the leaders on my “indie rock music” board, I will give TCV a nomination. Congrats, supergroup. Tinted Windows, eat your mmbop hearts out.

goodalbumalbumoftheyearnominee

This item is tagged for relay

11th Nov2009

NW Reviews: Bat for Lashes – Two Suns

by nickwan

What is this? What are you, Bat for Lashes? It’s part sexy, part entrancing, part horrible, part amazing. I am always thrown off when those artists who “hide behind a name” end up being only one person. Like onelinedrawing for instance. That’s just Jonah Matranga. Dashboard Confessional was once just Chris Carrabba. Bat for Lashes is just some girl named Natasha Khan. Is she just some girl?

Well, from what the concept album suggests, she might be two girls. The album is based around this girl she has named Pearl, which turns out to just be herself. The concept is that there are two realms of life and although one walks in one avatar, the other avatar is just as lively somewhere in you. The story itself, yes, might be a little lame… but does that make the music lame?

Over the years, some very strong alternative pop singers have hit the scene and definitely have proverbially rocked it. Feist, for example, had a giant hit with that counting song… but she also had a wonderful album to counter the quirky poppiness that Apple loves to promote in their commercials. Does Bat for Lashes have that same effect? Maybe if this was the mid 90s. I get two vibes from this album… someone who should have made it back when the Lillith Fair was still popular with Fiona Apple and Melissa Etheridge and this other vibe of Evanesence gone synthpop. And that’s not really a great combo.

Pros: she can sing well, and the music fits the voice.

Cons: the voice she has is Amy Lee but more girl power.

People who would like this: people who LOVE musak. You know. That stuff you put on because you hate the sound of silence, but you don’t really listen to. Some people enjoy throwing on a neutral album everyone likes… like a Blink 182 album or The Beatles. Some people throw it on a shuffled playlist. Others throw on musak, that stuff no one really listens to but it’s there. This album is a musak album. It shouldn’t be there. But if it is, not many would mind it.

As far as minding this for my list? Sorry Khan, you got nice… er… vocals… but you don’t have a nice album. At least nice enough for this year. Go back in time far enough and you’ll be a queen.

badalbum

11th Nov2009

NW Reviews: Fanfarlo – Reservoir

by nickwan

Fanfarlo might be considered the most scene band of the year. Running up a ruckus at SXSW and CMJ this year, Fanfarlo has the sound of a refined Beirut and the hype of a broken up 90s band’s reunion show. Aside from tearing up the indie scene with it’s “organic” sound and pseudo-lo fi production, does it stand on two legs or is this another “it” band still crawling around?

It’s the new thing to sound like you’re a singery-songwritery band but the live show is packed with 12 – 120 people on stage with shakers and balloons and instruments that aren’t even mic’d or do anything to move the song/show forward. Some bands, like Manchester Orchestra, hang on the live show bearing more members on stage than there are members in the band or square footage on the stage they are playing. Aside from the fire marshal not being too happy about this, some people (like me) have a hard time trying to wade through whether I like the band because the music is actually good or if the live show is what draws me to them. For the kids in Manchester Orchestra, I like their music. But I was definitely disappointed when I picked up their album after I first heard them live since the intensity of their live show doesn’t bear a mark on the album. As for this band, Fanfarlo, I feel that the album could possibly do the band justice if the live show doesn’t sound like shouting in a small room to me. And based off these videos I’ve seen plastered over the uberindie super scene blogs… yes, Fanfarlo is the real deal.

So, now that Fanfarlo passes the “real band” test, does their album bear any weight? Well, you have a unique blend of zero synths and a lot of instrumentation (isn’t that what music is supposed to be anyway?). On top of this, you have a guy whose voice isn’t that great if this were that singer-songwriter project that it definitely could have been (and probably was at one point). So to make up for the lack of powerful vocals, you do have a nice blend of great listenable music. Not just musicianship that makes you doing Riemann sums to figure out the time signature, but music for the sake of being able to play simple and clean, catchy music. And yes, the musicians are good as well, but that’s beside the point. This album isn’t about showcasing any musician at any point of the album. This album is all about putting you in a mood to dance, sing along, and/or put you in a good mood.

The pros: actual instruments! It’s so hard to get a band where all the members play the instruments they are noted for playing in the studio and on stage as well. Lately, bands have been taking that “studio versus live” look at albums and creating two different entities for themselves. It’s not a band thing other bands do this, it’s just very refreshing when a band doesn’t go with the flow of the scene some times. And Fanfarlo succeeds luckily.

The cons: it’s not as great as people make it sound. Yes, it’s a good album and it’s nice to listen to but this isn’t smashing or breakthrough. It might be the best available for the type of indie rock these guys are playing, but by no means have they flipped a switch.

Who would like this: people into pop-rock. Bands like Beirut, Mates of State, Silversun Pickups, Yeah Yeah Yeahs, Minus the Bear, etc. Those bands that fill that indie-pop niche would all be great touring buddies for these guys. It’s just a shame his voice isn’t as powerful as some of the other singers in this field of music. If this guy’s voice was a little more his own and less stock for this kind of music, this band would be all over the radio. In an even better aspect of this band, I think Fanfarlo could possibly be one of the bridging bands to get more of this slightly progressive indie-pop rock on the airwaves. Songs like “Harold T. Wilkins or How to Wait For a Very Long Time” and “The Walls are Coming Down” are great radio friendly songs. They might not be as hooky as the songs on right now, but I do believe there is a space for them somewhere. KROQ I’m looking at you.

As for… album. Of. The Year. You know what, I’d be lying to myself if this wasn’t competitive. It’s just as strong as Tegan and Sara’s effort in my mind, and comparable to that of Owen’s album… but I don’t really see this snowballing into the next aspect of music. The argument would be whether or not this band can bridge what is on the radio to a scene that isn’t really publicized, and although one would like to believe that one day this scene will get it’s up-and-attem’s I really don’t feel that the “next big step” is radio friendly music. That really isn’t what this is all about, is it? It’s about what sounds good. So, as far as sounding good, yes it can be comparable to that of a lot of the list I’ve compiled… but as far as mindblowing? Sorry Fanfarlo and tribe, let it simmer a year and we’ll see.

goodalbumalbumoftheyearnominee

09th Nov2009

NW Reviews: Weezer – Raditude

by nickwan

What do Avril Lavigne, Bowling for Soup, Pink, Lindsay Lohan, Lit, Simple Plan, Sevendust, The Donnas, Hot Hot Heat, American Hi-Fi, Default, Midtown, Pete Yorn, Fall Out Boy, All-American Rejects, SR-71, and The Academy Is… have in common? They’ve all had hit singles or albums produced by Butch Walker. As such, Butch Walker has put Weezer’s latest single, “I Want You To”, through the charts. It’s really catchy, which isn’t too different for Weezer (writers of Buddy Holly, El Scorcho, Hash Pipe, Dope Nose, and a zillion other sing-a-longs). The biggest difference seen on their latest album, Ratitude, is actually the opposite of Weezer and producer Butch Walker… the slew of other rap-artist-producers who are also on this album.

And this rap-produced thing seems to be working wonders. It’s nothing new, though. Technically, Rick Rubin has his fare share of rap productions with LL Cool J… oh yeah, he also produced Slayer and Metallica. And that was in the 80s. Today, Timbaland has produced Fall Out Boy’s latest album, and we can all see the obvious success of FOB if you’ve ever walked by a magazine rack and peeked into the tweenie section. Weezer has also been produced by Rick Rubin before, on their “green” album, however they have never seen the likes of Jermaine Dupri (So-So Def y’all) and Polow da Don (worked with 50 Cent, Justin Timberlake, Nas, TI, etc). The only other guy that balances out this production team are these dudes named Jacknife Lee and Dr. Luke. Combined, they’ve produced artists like Kelly Clarkson, Britney Spears, Bloc Party, Snow Patrol, and a slew of other chart toppers. So, with a team of hit-writing surgeons, how could Weezer possibly fail at writing their best album since Pinkerton?

Well… they didn’t.

Raditude is definitely Weezer’s best effort since Pinkerton, albeit a different Weezer sound. No longer plagued with the nerd-rock label in today’s terms, Weezer has done more path paving for bands in the past decade than most. Rivers and club have tried to show that you can balance shredding on the guitar with hit alternative rock songs. Raditude has been their holy grail on an everlasting quest from what it seems. Their musical scope changed dramatically with the departure of Matt Sharpe (founding bassist, featured on “blue” and Pinkerton). Why? Maybe because Rivers had lost his Harvard-educated mind between the years of Pinkerton and “green”? Who knows. I do know that since Sharpe took off due to writing issues with Rivers that the song writing went from quirky to more… emo (sigh).

Anyway, the album. Raditude is loaded with potential hits. You’ve probably already heard the lead track off the album, “I Want You To”. Aside from that song, some other potential hits are “The Girl Got Hot” and “Put Me Back Together”. This might see as much long-lasting love that the somewhat successful “green” album has seen, with tons of replays of their weak single “Island in the Sun” and some movie replays of “Hash Pipe”.

Pros: production is choice. If you don’t like this music but want to know what a seemingly perfectly produced album sounds like, this might be it for the year. Weezer’s sound hasn’t been tampered with, and the flourishing of hits produced seem to be blooming, which is usually a hit for the producer.

Cons: it’s not Pinkerton.

People who’ll like this: it’s pretty much across the board for people who would like this album. Mostly those into mainstream rock, or at least those who have a taste for it. It’s a little more glossy than I personally like, but I do like having it mixed into a playlist on shuffle. It’s also not so bad for studying if you just want some clean music coming through your speakers.

Album of the year though? Not likely. Strong, yes. But reinventing the rock wheel? It’s hard to say that Weezer is doing that. They seem to have filled their own niche created from their nerd rock days, and expanded by lame reenactments that have seemed to fail (e.g. The Reunion Show, etc). Since so many copycats have failed, it turns Weezer into a king of their own domain. But outside of that domain, what is happening? Not many would cite Weezer as a scene changer this decade, even though many will state their 90s releases as some major influences. Other than the legendary “blue” and Pinkerton, their past efforts don’t stack on top of that — even though Raditude is their best post-Sharpe album. And although Morrissey and An Horse have made the list, Weezer is a little too shiny and not as strong as the other two releases that occupy the similar subgenre they all fill. So, with that, sorry =w=. Good album, but not great in comparison.

goodalbum

Pages:12»